Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1929No. Docket No. 3796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon the application of the above-named petitioner for a writ of mandate praying that the respondent, Fred H. Johnson, as Auditor of the County of San Joaquin, be commanded and directed to issue and deliver to the petitioner a warrant upon the county treasurer of the county of San Joaquin for the sum of three hundred dollars ($300) in full compensation due said petitioner for his salary as justice of the peace of Stockton township in the county of San Joaquin, for the month of February, 1929.

To this petition the respondent has filed a general demurrer. The record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robertson v. LangfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Platnauer v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Slavich v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Simmons v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Styring v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API