Legal Opinion

Parker v. Child

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chaxceelor.

This is a suit brought to compel Child, who is a second mortgagee, to redeem the mortgaged premises which were sold under foreclosure of the complainant’s mortgage. Child was not a party to the proceedings, neither the complainant nor his solicitor being aware of the existence of Child’s mortgage, which appears however to have been duly registered when the bill in the foreclosure suit was filed. At the sale under the execution in that suit, the complainant bought the property at the price of $9000, and took a deed from the sheriff accordingly. The execution issued to raise and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vanderkemp v. SheltonNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  2. Benedict v. Gilman & CouchNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  3. Cooper v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  2. Hinners v. BirkevaagNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Surety B. L. Assn. v. RisackNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  4. Citicorp Mortg., Inc. v. PessinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Mueller v. MorrellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API