Legal Opinion

Surety B. L. Assn. v. Risack

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 28, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This somewhat complicated matter comes before the court on a motion to strike the amended bill of complaint and upon the return of an order to show cause why two ex parte orders of this court vacating the decrees pro confesso and final, master's report, writ of fieri facias, sheriff's sale, report and order of confirmation thereof, and permitting the complainant to file an amended bill should not be vacated and for nothing holden because improvidently made. The facts giving rise to the present proceeding are as follows:

The complainant foreclosed a mortgage and at a bid of $100 acquired title…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hudson Trust Co. v. BoydNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
  2. Parker v. ChildNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1874
  3. Shepard v. BarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Hinners v. BirkevaagNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Kaufman v. JurczakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re RothNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1947
  2. Memorial Shrines, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Henderson v. WeberNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1942
  4. U.S. Savings Bank v. SchnitzerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. New Realty Co., Inc. v. QuirkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API