Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 3, 1833PublishedCited by 9 opinions

concert

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

McDade mortgaged to Martin two lots of ground, to indemnify him as his surety in a note to the Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and also in a note for a smaller amount to a third person.

Judgment having been obtained on the latter, against McDade and Martin, an execution which issued thereon, was levied on the two lots, and the interest of both Me-Dade and Martin therein sold by the sheriff to Cooper, at a price much beyond the amount due on the execution.

By an arrangement between McDade, Cooper and Gentry, previous to the sale, it was…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watson & Polhemus v. SpenceNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Whitney v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Murdock v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Delespine v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Avery v. RyersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API