Legal Opinion
Hauck v. Bull
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1961No. File 9903PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.
This is a taxpayers’ action to recover public' funds alleged to have been unlawfully paid out under a void road construction contract.
The complaint alleges, in effect, that plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of Wachter Township, McPherson County, South Dakota, and bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated; that defendants, Charles W. Bull, Ruben Bertsch, Alden Flakoll, and Dean Melland are officers of Wachter Township and defendant, Erwin Martin, is a road contractor; that on or about June 17, 1959 the township officers entered into a c'ontraet with Martin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Friedman v. Washburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Fonder v. City of South Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Carlson v. City of FaithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Bak v. Jones CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Akron Savings Bank v. CharlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. CarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Northwestern Public Service Co. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.