Legal Opinion

Baughman v. Collins

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 30, 1999No. AC 18496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, J.

Suzanne Baughman, the plaintiff in this personal injury action, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Patrick Collins and the city of Norwalk. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence (1) the contents of a police report that contained hearsay statements of nonparty witnesses and (2) the defendants’ requests for admission because the responses were not competent evidence. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  4. State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JOSE G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. East Haven Builders Supply, Inc. v. FantonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. State v. LambertConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Pirolo v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API