State v. Nosik
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
*198 Opinion
PETERS, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, Lida Nosik, had the intent necessary for a conviction of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123.1 The answer to this question turns on whether the defendant lacked a good faith belief that she was legally married to Michael Kovac, also known as Milivoje,2 whom she listed as a dependent spouse in her application for her employee health insurance policy.
The defendant was charged with the crime of larceny in the second degree.3 After a trial to the court, Riefberg, J., she was found…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dacunzo v. EdgyeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.