Legal Opinion

State v. Nosik

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1998No. SC 15652PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*198 Opinion

PETERS, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, Lida Nosik, had the intent necessary for a conviction of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123.1 The answer to this question turns on whether the defendant lacked a good faith belief that she was legally married to Michael Kovac, also known as Milivoje,2 whom she listed as a dependent spouse in her application for her employee health insurance policy.

The defendant was charged with the crime of larceny in the second degree.3 After a trial to the court, Riefberg, J., she was found…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Dacunzo v. EdgyeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API