Legal Opinion
Bey v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-5319PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
Factual Background
Plaintiff Bey has filed a pro se complaint against the City of Philadelphia, the Philadelphia Police Department, a police officer named “C. Murray,” and Doe defendants, claiming violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Moroccan Treaty of 1787, the Free Moorish-American Zodiac Constitution, various sections of the United States Constitution, and international law. See Def. Mot. Ex. A. Bey alleges that on August 19,1995, he received a telephone call from his neighbor, who informed him that someone was breaking into his home. See id. Bey then…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Biosoft (Australia) Pty Ltd. v. Exotropin, LLC and Does 1-5District Court, D. Utah · 2025
- COLLINS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- CROOM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- CUSTIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEASDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- DRAYTON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.