Legal Opinion
Biosoft (Australia) Pty Ltd. v. Exotropin, LLC and Does 1-5
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 4, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00016Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH BIOSOFT (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. EXOTROPIN, LLC and DOES 1-5, Case No. 2:25-cv-00016-JNP-DBP Defendants. Chief District Judge Jill N. Parrish Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant Extropin, LLC (“Defendant”) brings this motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, transfer venue. ECF No. 16 (“Def.’s Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Biosoft (Australia) Pty Ltd. is “a proprietary limited…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.