Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1963No. Civ. 27049PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
In 1955, plaintiff purchased a new Ford automobile from Culver Motors, a dealer in Ford automobiles. In 1956, while driving in Colorado, plaintiff was involved in an auto accident whereby his car was badly wrecked and in which he received personal injuries. In 1957, plaintiff instituted suit against the Ford Motor Company (hereinafter referred to as Ford), and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (hereinafter referred to as Goodyear) in a federal court. This action was predicated on the theory of negligence in the testing and manufacture of a tubeless tire and of a wheel rim to hold such a tire.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Stockton Terminal & Eastern RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Herschfelt v. Knowles-Raymond Granite Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Rosencrantz v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Garrett v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Scherer v. MarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.