Legal Opinion

Scherer v. Mark

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1976No. Civ. 45815PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Dr. Howard Mark. The motion for summary judgment was based on the action being barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5).

Plaintiff allegedly was injured on or about October 23, 1971, while a patient at defendant Memorial Hospital of Southern California (Hospital). On June 14, 1972, she filed a complaint for personal injuries against Hospital and “Does I through XXX, inclusive.” It was alleged that “each of the Defendants designated herein as a Doe is in some manner responsible for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Day v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Woo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API