Legal Opinion

Blitz v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 13, 2018No. 17-cv-473-wmcPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge *1046Plaintiff Thomas Blitz filed this putative class action against Monsanto Company, alleging that the label on its product includes the following false, misleading and deceptive statement: "Glyphosate targets an enzyme found in plants but not in people or pets." (See Compl. (dkt. # 1) ¶ 34.) Presently before the court is defendant's motion to dismiss. (Dkt. # 10.) For the reasons discussed below, that motion is granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS1

Plaintiff Thomas Blitz resides in Waunakee, Wisconsin. (Compl. (dkt. # 1) ¶ 22.) He purchased Roundup from a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Knotts v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
  2. In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
  3. Loeb v. Champion Petfoods USA Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
  5. Abdou v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API