Whole Woman's Health Alliance v. Hill

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE

Plaintiffs have sued Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging as unconstitutional a broad swath of Indiana's statutory and regulatory restrictions on providing and obtaining abortions. Dkt. 1. Now before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice. Dkt. 37. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6). For the reasons given below, the motion is denied.

Background

Plaintiffs are Whole Woman's Health Alliance (WWHA); All-Options, Inc. ("All Options"); and Dr. Jeffrey Glazer ("Glazer"). WWHA "is a nonprofit organization committed to providing…