Legal Opinion
Ross v. Stricker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 15, 1954No. 35865PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
The verdict and judgment of $5,700 plaintiff in error obtained against defendant in error, W. H. Strieker d/b/a Mule Skin Brown Company, previous to the judgment ordering a new trial which he herein appeals from, was for damages on account of defendant in error’s alleged failure to carry out a contract to employ him in his Sand Springs’ store, for a period of one year. The parties appear herein in the same relative positions they occupied in the trial court.
Plaintiff’s theory was that the contract by which defendant agreed to employ him was partly oral and partly written,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laskey v. Rubel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Foster v. Atlas Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Holmes v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- First Nat. Bank v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Leifer v. ScheinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanley Clayman and Melvin Clayman v. Goodman Properties, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Moore v. EmersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Harry Hicks, of the Estate of W. F. Simmons, Deceased and R. S. Moran, of the Estate of Lenora J. Simmons, Deceased v. Homer Simmons and Oscar SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Scrivner-Stevens Company v. BoliarisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Midwestern Insurance Company v. RappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.