Prine v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.
Terrell Prine appeals from a denial of Rule 29.15 post-conviction, relief.1 Because we cannot meaningfully distinguish this case’s procedural sequence from that in Thomas v. State, 513 S.W.3d 370 (Mo. App. 2016), we must reverse and remand as in Thomas and cases cited therein.
Following Prine’s timely pro se motion, the court appointed “the Appellate/PCR Office of the State Public Defender” on May 4, 2015, and granted 60. days'to file an amended motion. Rule 29.15(g). The public defender who entered his appearance moved to withdraw and for reappointment of counsel one day before the amended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Kenith R. Wilson, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hewitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Montez Thomas v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
3Cited by2 opinions
- BRANDEN SLAVENS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020