Legal Opinion

Kenith R. Wilson, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2016No. ED103281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Mary K. Hoff, Judge

Kenith Wilson (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Because the motion court did not conduct an independent abandonment inquiry, we reverse and remand.

Procedural Background

We begin with the case’s procedural background, since Movant’s amended Rule 29.15 motion was untimely filed and post-conviction deadlines play “an important role in the orderly presentation and resolution of post-conviction claims.” Price v. State, 422 S.W.3d 292, 297 (Mo.banc…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Travis M. Stanley v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  4. Eastburn v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Samuel L. Lomax v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Ross v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Prine v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Terrance T. Norman, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API