Legal Opinion
James Ryan v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 28, 1993No. 91-5236PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT - HENDERSON.
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
James Ryan appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Before the district court Ryan challenged the suspension of his Social Security retirement benefits. The court found that Ryan’s case arose under the Social Security Act and that Ryan had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
In 1987 Ryan became eligible for and began receiving Social Security…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Wilbur v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Hidalgo v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Norman v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Elec. Privacy Info. Ctr. v. Internal Revenue Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.