Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Duff

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1895No. 1732PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Cowlitz County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion -of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Respondent was indebted to one H. C. Taylor, and the Ainslie Lumber Company was indebted to him. In payment of his indebtedness to Taylor he drew an order, payable ninety days after date, on the said lumber company, which was accepted by it. Before it became due the lumber company became insolvent and the draft was not paid. This action was brought by the plaintiff as assignee of the said Taylor, the payee of the draft, to recover of the defendant as the drawer thereof.. It appears from the record that due notice of the dishonor of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Susquehanna Bridge & Bank Co. v. EvansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1824
  3. Kirkham v. BostonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Beattie v. BrowneIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Evans v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Tassel v. McGrailWashington Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API