Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Nashua

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 2, 1943No. 3438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

The board of fire commissioners of the defendant city had requested its board of public works to install hydrants closer to the Ledge Street dump than those already in place, in order that fires at the dump might be more effectively controlled and put out. From the existing hydrant the distance to the dump was some 1,800 feet. The city preferred to use its old hose for fires at the dump and this consisted of fifty-foot lengths. The coupling of these pieces took some time. The city decided to comply with the request of its fire commissioners and undertook to install two hydrants, one 446 feet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gates v. MilanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  2. Edgerly v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
  3. Gilman v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. Stevens v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  5. Fournier v. BerlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. McGrath v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Day v. City of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  4. McInnis v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API