Legal Opinion

Merrill v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 29, 1974No. 6281Published

1Opinion of the Court

114 N.H. 722 (1974)

RITA V. MERRILL

v.

CITY OF MANCHESTER.

ALBERT F. MERRILL

v.

SAME.

ALICE E. ELHADY

v.

SAME.

No. 6281.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

November 29, 1974.

Nixon, Christy & Tessier and John E. Peltonen (Mr. Peltonen orally) for Rita V. and Albert F. Merrill.

Kfoury & Williams (Mr. Paul R. Kfoury orally) for Alice E. Elhady.

J. Francis Roche and Clifford J. Ross, city solicitors (Mr. Ross orally), for the city of Manchester.

LAMPRON, J.

Actions by Albert and Rita Merrill, husband and wife, for damages resulting from a fall by Rita on July 2, 1970, caused by a defect in a sidewalk alleged to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API