Gilman v. Concord
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
The inquiry relates to a municipality’s liability for the wrongful conduct of its agents and servants in carrying out its undertakings. The city was engaged in the performance of a public, governmental function. By the statute then in force (P. L., c. 190, s. 1) gypsy and brown-tail moths, and their eggs, caterpillars, pupae and nests were declared to be public nuisances. Within certain areas inclusive of highway locations municipalities were required to destroy the nuisance as an imposed duty. Ib., s. 3. By another statute (P. L., c. 42, s. 4, xxv) a town, and hence a city (P. L., c. 54, s.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rhobidas v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- O'Brien v. County of RockinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
- Gates v. MilanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- Gilman v. LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875
- O'Brien v. DerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sousa v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Ronayne v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Tarbell Administrator, Inc. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Reynolds v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
- Day v. City of BerlinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.