Stevens v. Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
“The use of the water from the hydrants is a public use, enjoyed in common by the people, and from which the city in its corporate capacity receives no special advantage; and, in the absence of a statute giving the action, the defendants cannot be made liable for a neglect of duty in respect to such public use.” Edgerly v. Concord, 62 N. H. 8, 22, and cases cited. The limitations of municipal liabilities have been discussed in many cases since Edgerly v. Concord was decided in 1882. In none of these cases is there any question made of the soundness of the proposition above quoted. It has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- House v. Houston Waterworks CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Lenzen v. City of New BraunfelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Butterworth v. City of HenriettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Piasecny Ex Rel. Piasecny v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Reynolds v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
- Sousa v. State of New Hampshire Sweepstakes CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Wilson v. National Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.