Legal Opinion
Norman v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1988No. S-1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In 1982, this court affirmed a judgment entered against Isaac C. Norman on the ground that a shareholder could not maintain an action for loss of the value of stock for breach of a shareholders agreement. Norman v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd., 645 P.2d 191 (Alaska 1982). Four years later, this court reversed itself and allowed a different shareholder to pursue identical claims against the same defendants arising from the same transactions and shareholders agreement. Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd., 713 P.2d 1197 (Alaska 1986). This appeal presents the question…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. Cook & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Leonard McKNIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Laura Ann Morris v. Adams-Millis Corporation, Michael T. Braswell, Attorney ForCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the Umwa Combined Benefit Fund, (99-6110), Secretary of Health and Human Services, (99-6111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Clauson v. ClausonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Juelfs v. GoughAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Gilbert v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.