Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Cook & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1975No. 97-70PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants have moved for relief under Rule 60(b), F.R.Civ.P., from a judgment of this court. The problem is that the same vehicular accident has produced divergent results in federal and state courts. We grant the motion and remand the case to the district court with directions.
Edwards, the owner and driver of a tractor-trailer combination, was hauling wheat for defendant-appellee Cook. On January 11, 1968, Edwards’ rig collided on an Oklahoma highway with a car driven by Ted Pierce. Pierce was killed and passengers in his car were injured. Claudiatte…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the Umwa Combined Benefit Fund, (99-6110), Secretary of Health and Human Services, (99-6111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.