Legal Opinion
City of San Marino v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1960No. Civ. 24244; Civ. 23660PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
These two eases have been consolidated for hearing on appeal. The controversy, broadly speaking, centers around the uses defendants desire to make of their property located in the city of San Marino. One of these actions was brought by the city for declaratory relief. In that action defendants filed a cross-complaint for a writ of mandate. Both sides have appealed from different portions of the judgment. In the other suit, the city sought and obtained an injunction. Defendants have appealed.
The first action (No. 24244) was instituted on September 13, 1956, by the city, seeking a construction…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dahl v. City of Palo AltoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Broadway Laguna, Vallejo Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kappadahl v. Alcan Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Stolman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.