Legal Opinion

Zaske Ex Rel. Bratsch v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 2002No. C3-02-454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant county challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment in which the county argued that statutory and vicarious official immunity protect it from liability for an accident allegedly caused by its failure to replace a stop sign that was knocked down four days before the accident. Because the evidence does not present a genuine issue of material fact about whether appellant had actual notice of the missing sign and because constructive notice constitutes a challenge to the county’s discretionary conduct, we reverse.

FACTS

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Watson v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Steinke v. City of AndoverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minder v. Anoka CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Christine L. Rathbun v. Fillmore CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API