Legal Opinion

Madison v. Steller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1937PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The sole question upon this appeal is the proper construction to be given the liability policy issued by defendant insurer to Callaway Fuel Company. The policy in compliance with sec. 204.30 (3), Stats., contained an omnibus coverage clause which read as follows :

“The insurance provided under section II hereof is extended to apply in the same manner and under the same conditions and provisions as it is applicable to the assured named in statement II of the schedule of statements, to any person *88while riding in or operating any automobile described in this policy when such automobile is being…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernard v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Farley v. American Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Frye v. TheigeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API