Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 Dwayne Brown appeals pro se from the trial court’s order dismissing, without a hearing, his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 9541-9546. On appeal Brown claims ineffectiveness 1 of counsel 2 due to a. conflict of interest arising from trial counsel’s dual representation of him and his co-defendant. Because Brown has set forth facts which show the potential for harm as a result of counsel’s dual representation, we reverse and remand for a hearing on his petition.
FACTS
¶2 Brown entered a negotiated guilty plea to two counts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. BreakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Com. v. Hughes, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Thomas, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019