Commonwealth v. Cullen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant and his codefendant were represented by the same counsel at trial. Both defendants pleaded guilty to several indictments and not guilty to the others. Both were found guilty to all except one of the indictments actually tried. At sentencing, the notes of testimony reveal the following: “The Court: Have you anything to add, [trial counsel]? [Trial counsel] : Well, if your Honor pleases with reference to [appellant], I don’t believe he has anybody here. Is anybody here in your behalf? [Appellant] : No sir. [Trial counsel] : Do you want to say anything? Speak up…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth ex rel. Gass v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dukes v. Warden, Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WheelerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.