Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cullen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1969No. Appeals, 352 to 361PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant and his codefendant were represented by the same counsel at trial. Both defendants pleaded guilty to several indictments and not guilty to the others. Both were found guilty to all except one of the indictments actually tried. At sentencing, the notes of testimony reveal the following: “The Court: Have you anything to add, [trial counsel]? [Trial counsel] : Well, if your Honor pleases with reference to [appellant], I don’t believe he has anybody here. Is anybody here in your behalf? [Appellant] : No sir. [Trial counsel] : Do you want to say anything? Speak up…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Gass v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dukes v. Warden, Connecticut State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. KnightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. WheelerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. BraceySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API