Legal Opinion
Seaton v. Builders Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 23, 1977No. CA 7341PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Petitioner’s statement of the case is accurate and complete, and we adopt it. It reads in pertinent part:
"This is a petition for judicial review of a final order of the Builders Board assessing a $400 civil penalty against petitioner because petitioner submitted a bid to do the work of a builder as defined in ORS Chapter 701 [ORS 701.005(2)] without having a certificate of registration as required by ORS 701.055(1).
"There is no question of fact involved.
"Petitioner is a self-employed journeyman plumber, licensed under ORS 447.030 and has a journeyman’s certificate of competency issued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Idleman's CommitmentOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Multnomah County v. MittlemanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Robinson v. Builders Board of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fintel v. Oregon (In Re Fintel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1981
- Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Roelle v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982