Legal Opinion

Seaton v. Builders Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 23, 1977No. CA 7341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Petitioner’s statement of the case is accurate and complete, and we adopt it. It reads in pertinent part:

"This is a petition for judicial review of a final order of the Builders Board assessing a $400 civil penalty against petitioner because petitioner submitted a bid to do the work of a builder as defined in ORS Chapter 701 [ORS 701.005(2)] without having a certificate of registration as required by ORS 701.055(1).
"There is no question of fact involved.
"Petitioner is a self-employed journeyman plumber, licensed under ORS 447.030 and has a journeyman’s certificate of competency issued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Idleman's CommitmentOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Multnomah County v. MittlemanOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Robinson v. Builders Board of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fintel v. Oregon (In Re Fintel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1981
  2. Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Roelle v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API