Legal Opinion

Multnomah County v. Mittleman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1976PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action by Multnomah County to recover $17,600 in unpaid taxes imposed by a county ordinance on all documents transferring real property and tendered for recording in the public records of the county. That ordinance included an "emergency clause.” Despite that emergency clause, a referendum petition was filed and the ordinance was defeated by the voters at the next general election.

The case was tried to the trial court, sitting without a jury. That court entered a judgment in favor of defendants upon the ground that the County, by its acquiescence to that referendum, had waived…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Sanok v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bernstein Bros. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API