Multnomah County v. Mittleman
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action by Multnomah County to recover $17,600 in unpaid taxes imposed by a county ordinance on all documents transferring real property and tendered for recording in the public records of the county. That ordinance included an "emergency clause.” Despite that emergency clause, a referendum petition was filed and the ordinance was defeated by the voters at the next general election.
The case was tried to the trial court, sitting without a jury. That court entered a judgment in favor of defendants upon the ground that the County, by its acquiescence to that referendum, had waived…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Garbade and Boynton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Sanok v. GrimesOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Bernstein Bros. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Medford Firefighters Ass'n, Local 1431 v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.