Legal Opinion

Trucco v. Erie Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1945No. Appeal, 219PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

We have carefully considered the record in this case in the light of the argument made on behalf of appellant, but must agree with the Superior Court that the Amendment of August 11,1939, c. 685, § 1, 53 Stat. 1404, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51, to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, is controlling and that the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act is inapplicable.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by the Superior Court in its opinion reported in 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 398, 43 A. 2d 626.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trucco v. Erie Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maxie v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. Goldman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. LibbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Holl v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
  5. Knox v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API