Legal Opinion

Trucco v. Erie Railroad Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1945No. Appeal, 135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Claimant, on September 15, 1941, was employed by defendant at its blacksmith shop at Meadville, Pa. In this shop repair parts for defendant’s locomotives were made. This was the principal type of work in that shop. Claimant was hired as a helper to one of the blacksmiths to assist in the making of such parts, and at the time of the alleged accident he was engaged in making “strap hangers” used as replacement parts for defendant’s locomotives. Defendant is an interstate railroad, and its locomotives are necessarily used in the conduct of interstate commerce. Claimant had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  4. Scarborough v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Jordan v. Erie Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trucco v. Erie Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Dydo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API