Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal, our Court granted review to determine whether Appellee, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), may be considered an “arm” of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which, under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, would confer upon SEPTA sovereign immunity from lawsuits brought by injured employ*1160ees of its Regional Rail Division under the Federal Employees Liability Act (“FELA”) 45 U.S.C. §§ 5I-60.1 After careful review, we conclude SEPTA cannot be deemed an “arm” of the Commonwealth and, thus, is not entitled to…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kull v. GuisseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. M. Morgalo v. S. Gorniak (SCI Albion Accountant) v. Montgomery County Clerk of CourtsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth Department of Corrections v. TateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. In re the Tax Claim Bureau of Westmoreland CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API