Legal Opinion

Mead v. Mead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1956No. 37201PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This appeal involves proceedings to vacate a decree of divorce obtained by defendant in error, Mr. Mead, on June 2, 1955, in an action he instituted in the trial court at Atoka, against his then wife, Mrs. Mead, the defendant in error, In said decree, he was given custody of the couple’s son and daughter of the ages of four and two years, respectively.

Mead’s original home was at Atoka, but there was an interval before his return there, and commencement of the action, when he and his wife lived at Mountain Home, Idaho. Exactly how long he had been back at Atoka before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. RowlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Shuler v. VigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Griggs v. Reeser Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. DunnamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Burns v. Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Gragg v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. In Re Bennett's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Mayes County Milk Producers Ass'n v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API