Legal Opinion

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Dunnam

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1928No. 16806PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

E. D. ¡Dunnam, as plaintiff below in this action against Muskogee Electric Traction Company, by the judgment of tbe court based upon the verdict of a jury, secured judgment of $5,000, compensating him for personal injuries resulting from a crossing accident. Tbe defendant maintained an electric line from Muskogee to Hyde Park, a distance of seven miles northeast of tbat city, using such line for both passenger and freight traffic. At tbe point where the accident occurred, defendants line runs in an easterly direction and is crossed by a public highway running north, tbe same being a country…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Eppstein v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Shea v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Nipp's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Skaggs v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Mead v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Ponca City v. SwayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API