Mayes County Milk Producers Ass'n v. Hunter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
In the trial court, defendants in error obtained a verdict and judgment as plaintiffs, against plaintiffs in error, as defendants, for the sum of $637.32, as the balance allegedly due said plaintiffs by said defendants for insurance furnished defendants through plaintiffs’ insurance agency. After the overruling of defendants’ motion for a new trial, they perfected the present appeal. Where not otherwise referred to, our continued reference to the parties will be by their trial court designations.
The case was tried as if the above-named balance arose out of an account…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Gladys Belle Oil Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Duerr v. Sloan.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Mead v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. of Dallas v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- District Agency Co. v. Suburban Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Gilkes v. GilkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. Great Plains Care Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Ralston v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.