Legal Opinion
Tull v. Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 12, 2007No. 104,472PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT DICK BELL, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant/Appellant, Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (DPS), appeals from the trial court’s order requiring that DPS allow PlaintiffiAppellee, David Tull, to apply for an Oklahoma driver’s license. DPS maintains Tull is ineligible to apply for an Oklahoma driver’s license pursuant to 47 O.S.Supp.2006 § 6-103(A)(3) because his driving privileges have been permanently revoked by the State of Florida. Tull contends the Oklahoma Driver License Compact, 47 O.S.2001 § 781 et seq., provides an exception to § 6-103(A)(3) that allows him to apply for an Oklahoma…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Gwin v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Strong v. LaubachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Estate of Villines v. SzczepanskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Pallas v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Roop v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Joseph Rivera v. State of Alaska, Department of Administration Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
- PennDOT v. Roop, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.