Legal Opinion

City of Boston v. Gordon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 8, 1961PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These are two actions by the city, brought by writs dated October 17, 1958, to recover a balance alleged to be due on certain real estate taxes from the taxpayers named in the actions respectively. The cases were consolidated for trial. Certain facts were stipulated. The city offered evidence mentioned below which was excluded, subject to the city’s exception. The trial judge found the facts to be as stated in the stipulation, ordered judgment for the defendant in each action, stayed all further proceedings, and reported “the cases, including the exclusion of the preferred testimony and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Brush Hill Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Cox v. SegeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Iannelle v. Fire Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  5. Joyner v. Lenox Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Town of Nantucket v. BeineckeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Alves's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Danvers Savings Bank v. HammerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Kelly v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. MacNeil v. Town of AvonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API