Legal Opinion
Joyner v. Lenox Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 28, 1947PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The main objective of this bill in equity is an adjudication that the plaintiffs Herbert Newton Joyner and Beatrice E. Joyner, his wife, are the owners of certain real estate in Lenox subject to a first mortgage held by the defendant bank and to a second mortgage held by their *48son, the plaintiff Herbert C. Joyner, as assignee. This involves an adjudication that certain foreclosure proceedings conducted by the bank are of no effect and that a deed from the bank to the defendant Holmes, who purchased from the bank and now occupies the real estate, should be cancelled. There are, among others,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Lamson & Co. v. AbramsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Erskine v. TownsendMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Choate v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- US Bank National Association v. IbanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Bevilacqua v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- In Re Prichard Plaza Associates Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- DiMare v. CapaldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Salter v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.