Legal Opinion

Danvers Savings Bank v. Hammer

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 15, 1982No. 80-328PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

On February 9, 1970, Richard Hammer borrowed $7,000 from the Danvers Savings Bank and executed a promissory note in favor of the bank. The note was secured by land in Box-ford, Massachusetts. After the defendant defaulted, the bank fore closed on his property. No potential buyers attended the foreclosure sale except bank representatives. They purchased the defendant’s real estate for $100, and later resold it for $2,025. The bank sought a $10,040.02 deficiency judgment against Hammer, consisting of the sum of the $7,000 principal due under the note, $1,523.55 in accrued interest, $1,237.88 in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cambridge Savings Bank v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Chartrand v. Newton Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Guempel v. Great American InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. City of Boston v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. State Realty Co. of Boston, Inc. v. MacNeil Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Financial Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Fleming v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Lowell v. U.S. Savings Bank of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Bryant v. Liberty MutualDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Carrols Equities Corp. v. JacovaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API