Legal Opinion

Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing Commission

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 2, 1949PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This petition for a writ of mandamus is brought by the selectmen of Topsfield and five other inhabitants of the town against the members of the State racing commission to restrain the commission from taking action upon an application of the North Shore Corporation for a license to hold harness horse racing meetings at the Topsfield Fair Grounds in said Topsfield. The North Shore Corporation was allowed to intervene as a party respondent. The demurrer of this respondent was overruled and, there being no dispute as to the facts, the judge ordered the writ to issue, restraining the commission…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Hardesty v. Aracoma—Chief Logan No. 4523West Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Adamowicz v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Champigny v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API