Legal Opinion
Fairbanks v. Director of Patuxent Institution
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 26, 1961No. [App. No. 4, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
The application for leave to appeal in this case, filed before our decision in Purks v. State, 226 Md. 43, 171 A. 2d 726, is controlled by that decision.
The applicant, after hearing, was determined to be a defective delinquent by a judge of the Criminal Court of Baltimore, sitting without a jury. It appears that Dr. Boslow, the Director of Patuxent Institution, in testifying as to his report made pursuant to Code (1957), Article 31B, Section 7 (a), read all or a part of the following reports, which were con tained in said report: report of a social worker (Children’s Psychiatric Service)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Purks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sas v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- John Sas v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution, Albert Delanor Murel v. State of Maryland and Director of Patuxent Institution, James C. Shine v. State of Maryland, Director of Patuxent Institution and the Maryland State Legislature, Timothy Patrick O'COnnOr v. State of Maryland Director, Patuxent Institution, George L. Creswell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Silvestri v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.