Legal Opinion

State v. Mancuso

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1976No. C 75-04-1358 Cr, CA 5607PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant was indicted for forgery in the first degree, in violation of ORS 165.013, in five separate indictments, each charging defendant with forgery on a different date. The indictments were based on repeated forgeries of the same signature using the same credit card to purchase gasoline for the same car from the same service station during a five-week period.

The prosecutor did not move to consolidate the charges. Defendant was tried and convicted of one charge. Before his second forgery trial, defendant moved to dismiss the remaining four indictments on the ground of former jeopardy.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Custer v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API