Custer v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his action for post-conviction relief, which arose from his conviction for sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. Specifically, petitioner contends that his criminal defense counsel breached his duty to exercise skill and professional judgment by failing to assert that, because of the dismissal of a previous sodomy prosecution against petitioner, the prosecution resulting in petitioner’s conviction was barred by former jeopardy. We conclude that former jeopardy did not bar the underlying prosecution because that prosecution did not arise out of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Ashley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Peters v. BELLEQUECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Jimmie Lee Custer v. Jean Hill, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004