Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1978No. C 77-11-16132, CA 10273; No. C 77-11-16133, CA 10274PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In these two consolidated cases, defendant appeals convictions for Forgery in the First Degree. He assigns as error (1) an adverse ruling in the trial court as to the sufficiency of the evidence to make out a charge of Forgery in the First Degree, (2) refusal to dismiss one of the charges on double jeopardy grounds, and (3) error in imposing a minimum sentence. The sentence imposed was erroneous, and requires remand. In all other respects, we affirm.

Defendant was charged in two separate indictments, Nos. C-77-11-16132 and C-77-11-16133. He was actually tried first on No. C-77-11-16133, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. BusseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MayorgaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API