Legal Opinion

Huxley v. Pennsylvania Warehousing & Safe Deposit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 1, 1909No. 10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, Norman S. Huxley, herein styled plaintiff, brought an action against the Pennsylvania Warehousing & Safe Deposit Company, herein styled defendant, to recover six automobiles. . Thereupon the defendant presented to *588that court a petition wherein it alleged it had no title to said machines; that they had been stored with it by the Dragon Automobile Company, to which it issued six certificates; that the plaintiff claimed ownership of the automobiles by virtue of ownership of these certificates; that the Dragon Automobile Company, since the storage,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Watkins v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Kenworthy v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Armstrong v. EspySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Port v. Schloss Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. PetrasichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Huxley v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API