Legal Opinion
Port v. Schloss Bros. & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 16, 1907No. 53PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to the Circuit-, Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. In that court Schloss and others, citizens of Maryland, brought an action of assumpsit against Clarence A. Port and W. J. Snyder, citizens of Pennsylvania, partners trading as Port & Snyder, for a merchandise account in excess of $2,000. Both defendants were served. Port appeared and defended the suit. Snyder entered no appearance, but was called as. a witness. The jury was sworn against both defendants without objection by Port, and after a trial on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Williams v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Feibelman v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Alaska Salmon Co. v. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- IBBS v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- Huxley v. Pennsylvania Warehousing & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909