Huxley v. Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; John B. McPherson, Judge. Action by Norman S. Huxley against James A. Hayes, Jr. Judgment for defendant (191 Fed. 943), and plaintiff brings error.
1Per curiam
This case arises on defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s statement of claim. The demurrer was sustained by the court below, and the decision of the case depends upon the facts alleged in the statement of claim. These allegations are, briefly, as follows:
That on March 24, 1908, the plaintiff was the owner of six automobiles, made by the Dragon Automobile Company, together of the value of about $6,600; that these automobiles were, at the time stated, in the warehouse of the Pennsylvania Warehousing Company, in the city of Philadelphia, on storage, and the said Warehousing Company had issued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norcross v. Otis Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Huxley v. Pennsylvania Warehousing & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
- Huxley v. Pennsylvania Warehousing & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939