Legal Opinion
Kersten v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 1978No. Docket 77-1593PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Defendant Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange (DAIIE), appeals from an April 13, 1977, declaratory judgment, GCR 1963, 521, holding that, under plaintiffs’ insurance policy and under Michigan’s then hit-and-run statute, MCLA 257.1112; MSA 9.2812,1 DAIIE was liable to plaintiffs for damages arising out of an accident *463occurring May 14, 1975, when the vehicle driven by Beverly Kersten struck an unidentified truck tire spinning in front of her on the passing lane of the highway on which she was driving. At the bench trial the issue was whether the unusual circumstances of this case…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Barfield v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Milam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Dancey v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.